I am always a little shocked to hear people defend the level of control that the American government has over the Internet through its influence of ICANN, and just as shocked to hear people’s paranoid speculation that having America’s role transferred to a UN body would somehow lead to massive censorship and spying taking place, as if that’s never been possible in America, and as if UN technical bodies have any history of doing that. It is understandable when people fall into the logical fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantiam, with an “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” attitude, but even if we don’t know what a future UN solution might look like, we do know what America’s record of managing ICANN is, and it is not something about which you can say “it ain’t broke”. A friend of mine said that it was too stressful talking about these complicated technical and political matters early in the morning while I was driving us to catch a train, but hopefully none of my readers will be browsing my blog in that sort of situation. Anyway, below I will list some past actions of ICANN that are causes for concern, and explain why they were the result of American governmental influence.
Continue reading "ICANN, you can't"